[LISPWORKS][Common Lisp HyperSpec (TM)] [Previous][Up][Next]


Issue PACKAGE-FUNCTION-CONSISTENCY Writeup

Issue:        PACKAGE-FUNCTION-CONSISTENCY

References: 11.7 Package System Functions and Variables (pp182-188)

Category: CLARIFICATION/CHANGE

Edit history: 21-Oct-88, Version 1 by Pitman

12-Jan-89, Version 2 by Masinter (add MORE-PERMISSIVE option)

17-Mar-89, Version 3, by Masinter, MORE-PERMISSIVE as

amended & adopted at Jan 89 X3j13

17-Mar-89, Version 4, by Moon, correct amended wording

Problem Description:

CLtL is vague about whether either or both of package or package name

are permissible in some cases.

Proposal (PACKAGE-FUNCTION-CONSISTENCY:MORE-PERMISSIVE):

Clarify that it is permissible to pass either a package object

or a package name (symbol or string) in the following situations:

- the :USE argument to MAKE-PACKAGE or IN-PACKAGE

- the first argument to IN-PACKAGE, FIND-PACKAGE, RENAME-PACKAGE

or DELETE-PACKAGE

- the second argument to INTERN, FIND-SYMBOL, UNINTERN

- the second argument to EXPORT, UNEXPORT, IMPORT,

SHADOWING-IMPORT, and SHADOW

- the first argument (or a member of the list which is the first

argument) to USE-PACKAGE or UNUSE-PACKAGE.

- all package-name arguments in DEFPACKAGE except for the name and

nicknames of the package being defined.

- the first argument to PACKAGE-NAME, PACKAGE-NICKNAMES,

PACKAGE-USE-LIST, or PACKAGE-USED-BY-LIST

- the PACKAGE argument to DO-SYMBOLS.

- the PACKAGE argument to DO-EXTERNAL-SYMBOLS.

- the PACKAGE argument to DO-ALL-SYMBOLS.

If FIND-PACKAGE is given a package object as an argument, it simply

returns it.

Clarify that the function MAKE-PACKAGE permits only a package name

as an argument since it does not make sense to create an existing

package.

Clarify that package nicknames must always be expressed as package

names (symbols or strings) and may never be actual package objects.

In the list above, IN-PACKAGE may be changed to SELECT-PACKAGE

if IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY:NEW-MACRO passes.

Examples:

(INTERN "FOO" "KEYWORD") => :FOO

(DEFVAR *FOO-PACKAGE* (MAKE-PACKAGE "FOO"))

(RENAME-PACKAGE "FOO" "FOO0")

(PACKAGE-NAME *FOO-PACKAGE*) => "FOO0"

(PACKAGE-NAME "SYS") might return "SYSTEM".

Rationale:

This makes things more consistent.

It also adds a generally useful capability.

Current Practice:

Symbolics Genera & Lucid permit strings as package names.

Symbolics Cloe does not permit strings as package names.

In Lucid FIND-PACKAGE and IN-PACKAGE require names.

Cost to Implementors:

Small.

Cost to Users:

None. This change is upward compatible.

Cost of Non-Adoption:

Implementations would continue to vary gratuitously, leaving a potential

for portability problems.

Benefits:

The cost of non-adoption is avoided.

Aesthetics:

This makes things more regular, and so presumably more aesthetic.

Discussion:

Pitman ran across this problem while trying to port Macsyma to various

implementations. Discussion with other maintainers of portable programs

shows this is a common source of aggravation in portable code.

It would be possible to say that MAKE-PACKAGE took package objects as

arguments and just returned that package. That might have limited

usefulness on rare occasions, but mostly seemed too far out in left

field to bother suggesting it.


[Starting Points][Contents][Index][Symbols][Glossary][Issues]
Copyright 1996-2005, LispWorks Ltd. All rights reserved.